PA279CDV vs PA279CRV: OLED or IPS?

About the Author

Sesera editorial account organizes laptop, mini PC, smartphone, and gadget buying guides so readers can check the important points before buying.

PA279CDV and PA279CRV look alike on the model number, so the difference is easy to miss.

Both are 27-inch-class 4K monitors. The insides are not close. The large gaps are QD-OLED vs IPS, and 120Hz vs 60Hz.

Pick PA279CDV for picture performance. Pick PA279CRV if you keep static layouts on screen or want a lower price.

Quick difference table

PA279CDV uses QD-OLED and 120Hz. PA279CRV is IPS and lists Adobe RGB 99%.

ΔE is a color-error figure. Smaller is tighter. Adobe RGB and Auto KVM also differ in whether the spec is published.

The large gaps are panel type, 120Hz, HDR, and Adobe RGB. 4K and USB-C 96W power are shared.

Who should pick which

Usage is easier to follow than a spec dump.

• HDR video: PA279CDV
• Deep black: PA279CDV
• 120Hz work: PA279CDV
• Two PCs on one keyboard: PA279CDV
• Adobe RGB: PA279CRV
• Lots of static UI: PA279CRV
• Lower purchase cost: PA279CRV

Need HDR or 120Hz: PA279CDV. Need Adobe RGB or static layouts: PA279CRV.

If you pick on picture

PA279CDV’s QD-OLED can show deep black. Contrast also sits well above the IPS PA279CRV.

HDR peak is 1,000 cd/㎡, and it runs at 120Hz. HDR footage and motion checks show the gap.

PA279CRV lists DCI-P3 99% and Adobe RGB 99%. That is the gap to check for photo work headed to print.

PA279CDV does not publish Adobe RGB coverage. If Adobe RGB matters, PA279CRV is the candidate.

If you pick by job

PA279CDV has M Model-P3 to match a MacBook’s look. That helps a Mac edit desk.

Auto KVM shares one keyboard and mouse across two PCs. USB-C power is 96W on both.

PA279CRV is IPS, so you can leave a static screen without OLED burn-in as a daily worry.

PA279CDV has OLED Care and a proximity sensor. Those reduce burn-in risk, but the panel is still OLED.

Is the price gap worth it

What you mainly pay extra for on PA279CDV is QD-OLED, 120Hz, stronger HDR, and Auto KVM.

If you edit HDR or use 120Hz, there is a reason to spend more on PA279CDV.

If the goal is 4K and high color, PA279CRV still covers the needed parts.

If you will not use the extras, the extra budget for PA279CDV shrinks.

Q&A

Two HDMI devices?

If HDMI port count matters, PA279CRV. It has two HDMI 2.0 ports.

PA279CDV is HDMI 2.1, but only one port. Leave two HDMI devices plugged in, pick PA279CRV.

A bright room?

If typical brightness matters, PA279CRV. Rated brightness is 350 cd/㎡.

PA279CDV typical brightness is 250 cd/㎡. Treat that apart from HDR peak.

Will an arm work?

Both use VESA 100×100 mm. PA279CDV is about 5.6 kg. PA279CRV is about 5.78 kg.

An arm rated for 100×100 mm and that weight can mount either.

Bottom line

For picture performance, ASUS ProArt PA279CDV is the pick.

QD-OLED, 120Hz, HDR, and Auto KVM point here.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

ASUS ProArt PA279CDV

Check on Amazon

For 4K IPS and Adobe RGB 99%, ASUS ProArt PA279CRV-J is the pick.

Lots of static UI, or no need for OLED and 120Hz, PA279CRV-J is enough.